Inkers

Case Study

How a tech park reduced tenant fit-out delays and avoided major modification risk

The brief

A Grade-A IT/Tech park spans five towers and 10 lakh sq ft of leasable area. The shell-and-core programme had to land on a fixed go-live so anchor tenants could start fit-out without overlap with base-build trades. Anything that slipped past shop-drawing freeze meant on-floor rework, lease deferrals, and penalty clauses.

Why it was risky

Tech parks are the canonical multi-trade build. Structural grids, MEP risers, and core compliance interact with tenant fit-out programmes that arrive in parallel — often from three or four different design teams.

  • Structural rigidness: the published grid restricted workstation densities for the largest anchor tenant.
  • MEP capacity gaps: the original HVAC and electrical sizing was tuned to legacy office loads, not modern IT density.
  • Access bottlenecks: lift count and egress widths were close to the statutory floor — any late change risked an approval reset.
  • Fit-out conflicts: ceiling heights and service routes were sized for the base-build, not for tenant design intent.

What Kaël did

Kaël collapsed the timeline between design intent and site decision by running the numbers continuously, every time a drawing or a tenant brief changed.

  • Tenant planning simulations ran workstation density studies against the structural grid four months ahead of any tenant signing, surfacing dead-zone risk by floor.
  • MEP load analysis compared the design submittals against realistic IT loads — peak, off-peak, and 24×7 operations — and flagged under-provisioning before equipment was procured.
  • Compliance checks ran on every revision, keeping parking ratios, lift counts, and refuge widths inside the statutory band.
  • Auto-clash detection matched tenant fit-out drawings against the base-build model the day they arrived, so changes were costed in days, not months.

Outcome

Anchor tenants moved into fit-out windows without slippage. Cumulative tenant fit-out delay risk — assessed at 36 months across the five towers — was closed out before commissioning began, and ₹10–18 Cr of late modifications was taken off the change-order register.

Share

About the author

Shachhi Dubey

Construction is changing. Are you?

We work closely with every client to understand the specific project before anything else. Tell us what you're building.

How a tech park reduced tenant fit-out delays and avoided major modification risk · Inkers